Home: PCU 4 2002: CME Audio Series and Activity

Prostate Cancer Update: A CME Audio Series and Activity

Statement of Need/Target Audience
Prostate cancer is one of the most rapidly evolving fields in urology. Published results from clinical trials lead to the emergence of new surgical and radiation therapy techniques and therapeutic agents, along with changes in the indications for existing treatments. In order to offer optimal patient care — including the option of clinical trial participation — the practicing urologist must be well-informed of these advances.

To bridge the gap between research and patient care, Prostate Cancer Update utilizes one-on-one discussions with leading urologic oncology investigators. By providing access to the latest research developments and expert perspectives, this CME program assists physicians in the formulation of up-to-date clinical management strategies. Issue 4, 2002 of Prostate Cancer Update consists of discussions with four research leaders on a variety of important issues, including antiandrogen withdrawal response, timing and choice of hormonal therapy, extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy, appropriate biopsy algorithms, and effects of androgen deprivation on bone.

Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to:

  • Discuss how to use antiandrogen withdrawal as an intervention for prostate cancer patients progressing on combined androgen blockade.
  • Explain the rationale for monitoring patients with elevated PSAs and two negative biopsies, rather than obtaining further biopsies.
  • Compare the treatment trends in CaPSURE to one’s own management of prostate cancer patients.
  • Describe how to counsel prostate cancer patients about the timing and choice of hormonal therapy.
  • Explain the staging and therapeutic implications of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
  • Identify the effects of androgen deprivation therapy on bone and possible interventions in prostate cancer patients.
  • Review the relationship between obesity and race in predicting adverse pathologic variables in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Accreditation Statement

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and NL Communications, Inc. The Postgraduate Institute for Medicine is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Credit Designation Statement

The Postgraduate Institute for Medicine designates this educational activity for a maximum of 3 hours in category 1 credit toward the AMA Physician's Recognition Award. Each physician should claim only credits that he/she actually spent in the activity.

Faculty Disclosure Statements

The Postgraduate Institute for Medicine has a conflict of interest policy that requires course faculty to disclose any real or apparent commercial financial affiliations related to the content of their presentations/materials. It is not assumed that these financial interests or affiliations will have an adverse impact on faculty presentations; they are simply noted in this supplement to fully inform participants.

 
   

Home

Editor's Office

Editor’s Note:
Perceptions of treatment trade-offs in patients with prostate and breast cancer

Leonard G Gomella, MD, FACS
    - Select publications

Peter R Carroll, MD
    - Select publications

Peter T Scardino, MD
    - Select publications

A Oliver Sartor, BA, MD
    - Select publications

Faculty financial interests or affiliations

 
Terms of use and general disclaimer
© NL Communications, Inc. 2002. All rights reserved.